So accountability:
1. It refers to a particular act in relation with the person who executed it.
2. An act is attributable when two condiciones_
a) Knowledge of good and evil and the consequences of the act in question.
b) Capacity to act or fail to act under this knowledge.
3. Attributable to the act so I call "human act."
Given these assumptions "seems" that concludes:
1. Any act of a schizophrenic will only unimpeachable if it derives from his delirium.
Now this satisfies only the first condition: a knowledge (thought or idea pathology) but: Are all
also the second condition? Does the schizophrenic
an unplanned and impulsive act loses its freedom of action? I think not.
So second question:
2 - A measure derived from the delusions of a schizophrenic could be attributed due to retaining its freedom to act or not act.?
secondary Consideration:
A normal person affects of jealousy would have serious and justified reasons for that knowledge (ideas or thoughts) of murdering his lover or partner (the jealous) But if it does, is guilty, not the idea itself is not the action that might have missed. Therefore
status more important for accountability is the freedom to act or not.
Is the schizophrenic or paranoid disorder also affect your freedom? If so why?
September 1, 2006
Answer: D. Salvador Porras Obeso. Liaison Psychiatrist, Hospital de Elda.
calm Sr. Primi used when an employee, usually the same, and again got a leg, saying, "Don Salva be patient with him, is not a bad heart, but all you have for the big guy it's goofy and are making tontunas without thinking ".. the truth is that this employee was quite more problematic than the worst of the sick and raised concerns not only me, also aroused in the patient more grumpy chronic unit, was tall, not very stout, with crooked eyes and a scowl that without doubt anyone would feel somewhat ill at ease in his presence, despite being epileptic crisis was not controlled and I never gave mine to one day startled staff called me to come to visit, they had to restraint in bed and when I went only heard muttering: "this guy I have to kill" .. she repeated over and over again until it was reassuring, I went to find out the reason for such an offense .. in short, the patient had located a metal bar in the garden where he went and took it, the disguises and looking for the caregiver of yore and betrayal to him and throws a mamporrazo fortunately at the last moment was the man behind the gesture of defense against a coup that would go to his head. For the first time that the caretaker saw the wolf hair and accused him of being a bad bug ... still did not understand that their actions brought these consequences.
comes this brief commentary to the fact the planning and implementation actions. The patient knew and was free to act. There were no consequences and act as judge and jury. Nothing happened, the caretaker was careful not to disturb the patient and I think even less leg stuck for some time ... if it has survived and will be retired. The patient remained without creating conflict and punished .. I never remember what award perhaps? ... To the reader's left.
September 9 d e2006
Answer: D. Salvador Porras Obeso. Liaison Psychiatrist, Hospital de Elda
time to consider that there is a disorder in the freedom to act or not perhaps the closest approach to avoid mistakes in the assessment of the event must be based on the presence or absence of plans (the legal term preordained calls it), and the more inexplicable and absurd is an action a psychotic break, when not pre-planner reasoning when I was supposed to be an impulse or an act inconsistent and immediate action, you may need to accept the insanity. When there is time between thinking through self-defense, arm, attack treason, etc. .. there is no criminal responsibility: "How would a colleague of an incident in the unity of chronic psychotic patient is refractory to all our efforts to improve , but not stupid and knows his stuff and could not have done it.
therefore conclude that the second condition will depend on the time or distance between knowing, plan and act. tontunas The caregiver was not thinking and not ceased to be responsible, perhaps in a psychotic episode must be asked the same? In the incident, which I miss, and commenting on my colleague, the psychotic attacked just a person who behaved unfairly with him, as described with the caregiver. In both situations could have attacked the first to pass along to them as the azadazo and not, who were offended assaulted and did so with full knowledge and freedom, therefore they were attributed schizophrenia or severe epilepsy.
September 10, 2006
Answer: D. Salvador Porras Obeso. Liaison Psychiatrist, Hospital de Elda.
A schizophrenic retains its capacity to act or not act and only rarely lose that freedom. The most frequent acts of violence perpetrated by people with schizophrenia is to themselves, self-harm in ways that are much more frequent suicide (either by their positive symptoms or awareness of its limitations for life) that the killings unprovoked, just infringe on the property compared with other population groups and the attack is exceptional authority.
Maybe we could talk about insanity defense in very bizarre and incomprehensible acts arising from their positive symptoms or when acted reflected (not thought, not planned) and in situations Complex may apply a reduced accountability in certain circumstances in which it acted with automatic (defensive behaviors learned by training).
September 19, 2006
Answer: D. Salvador Porras Obeso. Liaison Psychiatrist, Hospital de Elda.
In principle any specific event but a schizophrenic come to be considered attributable (not true the belief that what a crazy person is not criminally responsible), and in particular the killing of a fellow at a specific time required to investigate the status and type of active symptoms at that time. After carefully reading the literature sent by a colleague I must insist that motivation for such an act has to be bizarre and incomprehensible to most mortals (read: Considerations on psychiatric expert opinions of crimes result in death. Information psychiatric No 146 / 4 th quarter, 1996).
Abstract: We have discussed some chaos patients and patients who have no plans or acted without thinking and we assume that in both situations there is accountability. No differences in the facts come from a patient or a non-schizophrenic patient. Both remain free to act upon a plan and they could act in rage or automatic.
conclusion: That exception to an act of a schizophrenic patient would have to assess the status and type of symptoms at that point in time in case lessen the freedom to act and should be guided in the extravagance or disproportion of the motivations that have led to such facts.
A paranoid schizophrenic or maintain the freedom of choice. They attributed it as a supposedly healthy. Exceptionally would be immune from prosecution both as the alleged psychotic healthy.
No comments:
Post a Comment